I used to buy Gene and especially the
outfits. Two things really stopped my enthusiasm: 1. To many dolls
were being released and too few outfits and 2. The price went up, but the
number of and quality of accessories went down. I also think the outfits
in the last year have been uninspiring. I collect vintage clothes from
the 1940s and 1950s and the design team has hardly tapped into the design
possibilities from that period. Its very disappointing.
I have never gotten into the Tonner dolls.
Their faces just don't appeal to me. I like the new Madame
Alexander fashion dolls--Alex and friends. But I see MA making the
same mistake of to many dolls being released a year and not enough outfits.
(Can you tell I like to redress my dolls?) Again these can be pricey, so
I tend to limit myself to only buying dolls or outfits that I really, really
like. After all for a $100 MA or Gene, I can buy 4 or 5 new
Candi's, Alyssa's, Janay's or Lollipop girls that I really like.
Barbara
I thought I'd make a foray over to ebay to see what the
prices are on Genes these days.
Definitely still in the basement, if not through to the
root cellar.
There was a time, a couple of years ago that the Premiere
Gene was fetching, easily
$500. I was expecting to see this price to remain
steady. But if I go by the one listing for this doll, the seller was
willing to sell the doll for the "Buy It Now" price of $399. What a
drop! She started the bidding at $49.99 and I guess bidders think they
can beat the $399 price because no one took the offer.
Has Ashton-Drake practically killed this doll line with
their over-zealous over-production of newer dolls? Or has Ashton-Drake
managed to cheapen the Gene image in ways I can't articulate? Then
again, is it possible that the doll's genre is so limiting that other 15.5"
dolls, like the Tonner dolls, relate better to collectors because of their
current fashion statements? I just don't follow the doll trends as
closely but from what I read on this List, Tonner's larger dolls do seem to
have a greater appeal than the Genes. Is this correct?
What is the perceived state of interest for Gene-line
dolls? Pat Brown