I have uploaded a new beta version of GPC to http://www.g-n-u.de/gpc/!
Because our main server is still out of order, please note:
- The new URL, as stated above. www.gnu-pascal.de still doesn't work.
- There are just the "bare bones" files (full and minimal source distribution, binaries for Linux/IA32 with and without gcc). No diffs, no separate test files, no HTML pages etc.
- The main directory in the full source distribution is probably different! Be careful with automatic build scripts.
- The releases are signed with a new OpenPGP key. The fingerprint is given in my signature in this mail and my other mails to the gpc@gnu.de list for some weeks.
When the main server is back again, I'll do the usual release procedures there.
One major change is that the types `Integer', `Word', `Cardinal' are now equivalent to `PtrInt', `PtrWord', `PtrCard', no more (necessarily) to C's `int' and `unsigned int' types. New types `CInteger', `CWord', `CCardinal' are provided for the latter purpose.
This affects C interfaces in particular. A "porting guide" is given below. If you maintain any such interfaces, be sure to read it carefully.
Another major improvement is in the area of initializers, thanks to Waldek Hebisch. GPC now allows initialization of variant records (fjf259.pas, peter6.pas) and packed arrays (emil5.pas) and supports Extended Pascal's structured initializers (fjf964*.pas, fjf967*.pas, fjf968*.pas) as well as record, array and set values (constdef.pas, fjf966*.pas, fjf971*.pas).
Unfortunately, we don't have very many test programs for these new features yet. If you can send us some (according to the guidelines described in the manual), this will be very welcome.
Other new features:
* `Discard'
* new make variable `GPC_PAGESIZE' to set the page size when building the manual (PDF, PostScript, DVI)
* `qualified' and import lists are no more allowed after `uses' (only after `import', as EP demands) (@)
* the `GMP' unit doesn't support gmp-2.x anymore (if you used it, just upgrade to a newer GMP version) (@)
* conflicts between object fields/methods and ancestor type names are detected as required by OOE (fjf945*.pas) (@) (O)
* repeated function headings (in `forward' declarations and interfaces) are checked stricter: if one has a result variable, so must the other (according to the OOE draft) (@) (O)
Bugfixes:
* records with no fields are invalid according to EP (fjf972.pas)
* `Index' and `Pos' cannot be used in constant expressions (fjf970*.pas)
* the `__FILE__' and `__BASE_FILE__' macros should return full paths
* `Sqr' sometimes evaluates its argument twice (fjf963.pas)
* memory leak in routines with a local variable of file type that are left via `Exit' or `Return' (fjf962.pas)
* using a Boolean function as a condition in a `repeat' loop doesn't work correctly (artur1*.pas)
* overstrict type-checking in comparisons involving procedural types (fjf960*.pas)
* `Read', `Write' etc. evaluate its arguments in the wrong order (az43*.pas)
* `Read' etc. evaluate references to string parameters twice (fjf958.pas)
* on targets with 16 bit `Integer' type, the `MicroSecond' field of `TimeStamp' causes a compilation error
* character arrays indexed by non-integer ordinal types treated as strings cause internal compiler errors (fjf957*.pas)
* `-W[no-]cast-align' does not work (fjf956*.pas)
* in `FormatTime' `%Z' and `%z' unless provided by system library ignore DST
* powerpc: `--strength-reduce' doesn't work with `for' loops (was kludged before, fixed in gcc-3.3.3)
* AIX: `ReturnAddress' doesn't work after use of dynmamic variables (backend bug, fixed in gcc-3.3.3)
* functions returning sets are called twice if range-checking is on (inga1*.pas)
PORTING GUIDE FOR THE NEW C COMPATIBLE INTEGER TYPES ====================================================
In my experience, the transition goes as follows:
1. If you want your code to keep working with older GPC versions after this change, add (near the top) the following part. You can omit the types you will not need in the following.
{$if __GPC_RELEASE__ < 20041017} type CInteger = Integer; CCardinal = Cardinal; CWord = Word; {$endif}
2. In all C-visible declarations, replace `Integer' with `CInteger' and `Cardinal'/`Word' with `CCardinal'/`CWord'.
C-visible declarations are usually `external' declarations (routines and/or variables) in Pascal which are implemented in C, but they can also be Pascal-implemented declarations (usually with a `name' attribute) which are declared `extern' in C code.
Do not forget structures that are used within such declarations, e.g. parameters of type [pointer to] a record, or procedural parameters, etc.
The same goes for other languages such as C++.
3. Fix any resulting incompatibilites. (This is the nasty part.)
Value parameters are usually no problem.
Anything else might be a problem, e.g., reference parameters, variables, structure fields, procedural parameters' parameters (including value parameters). As long as they are used only in the implementation of a unit/module which exports a Pascal interface, necessary changes can be confined to and handled within this interfaec.
Otherwise, you have the choice whether to change the interface, which will require further changes in code using the interface, or to add wrappers to keep the interface.
Example:
unit MyCInterface;
interface
uses GPC;
type t = record x, y, z: Integer end;
procedure a (n: Integer); external name 'a'; procedure b (var n: Integer); external name 'b'; procedure c (var r: t); external name 'c'; function d (var n: Integer): TString;
implementation
function cd (var n: Integer): CString; external name 'd';
function d (var n: Integer): TString; begin d := CString2String (cd (n)) end;
end.
Changing a to
procedure a (n: CInteger); external name 'a';
is usually harmless.
Changing b to
procedure b (var n: CInteger); external name 'b';
is problematic, since all callers would need to change their types (which might cause further ramifications in indirectly dependent code). So it might be in order to add a wrapper, such as:
procedure b (var n: Integer);
[implementation]
procedure cb (var n: CInteger); external name 'b';
procedure b (var n: Integer); var cn: CInteger; begin cn := n; { omit if n is used only as an "output" parameter } cb (n); n := cn end;
Procedure c uses a record containing `Integer' fields. Here, it's a hard choice between adding a wrapper (might be expensive, as the record gets bigger, and if more routines are affected) or changing the record to:
type t = record x, y, z: CInteger end;
The choice might depend on how many other routines use this structure and how many of them are written in Pascal or C, and how much existing code already uses the structure and what it does with it.
Function d already has a wrapper, so it's usually best to also take care of the new change there:
function d (var n: Integer): TString; var cn: CInteger; begin cn := n; { omit if n is used only as an "output" parameter } d := CString2String (cd (n)) n := cn end;
Finally, note that `Integer' might be bigger than `CInteger', especially on newer platforms (that's the reason for the whole change in the first place). So if you want to have a bigger range available, you might want to consider changing from `CInteger' etc. (`[unsigned] int' in C) to `MedInt' etc. (`[unsigned] long' in C). This, however, requires (possibly substantial) changes in the C code, and might be out of your control (when interfacing to 3rd party libraries).
Frank
-- Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs: http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html NEW! GPC download signing key: ACB3 79B2 7EB2 B7A7 EFDE D101 CD02 4C9D 0FE0 E5E8
-
Frank Heckenbach