-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 First off, let me apologize for being gone for so long. I've been ABEND for quite a while, and while Real Life(tm) threatened to sue me for negligence. The usual bullcrap. Anyway, I declined to follow the established semantics, as practice in the whole of reference.texi; i.e., sticking to the uses set forth in Texinfo's info pages. I was wondering if I should go ahead and submit this, then work on changing the rest of the docs, or if I should just go shove my changes up my arse. :) I haven't done much during my absence (just expanded private, protected, public, and a few others, IIRC), so I hope I haven't done much damage. I'm planning on putting more work into the docs while I also work on my other projects; should I go ahead with the semantic changes, or should I just roll with what's already been done? - -- Political Dissident Neil Santos Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos@jabber.org Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.3.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iEYEARECAAYFAkEkjEAACgkQcpujh3OVmbtd2QCfYhURzRxALFWkIMuwthykxTgR bRoAoKuzLTxw8FqGbKHJa/5hgdXMYKmk =GUyZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----