Prof. Harley Flanders wrote:
Sometimes life is simpler than appears at first glance :-)
I should have put in the stuff below in my previous message;
I was thinking of triangular matrices, where you save memory
by having the rows of different lengths.
It's probably more efficient to store it in a single array similar
to the link below (quick Google search) than allocating each row
individually.
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/sqg/dads/HTML/upperTriangularMatrix.html
But please tell me, have you _ever_ used 3-D arrays? 4-D arrays?
Yes. Yes.
Frank