4 Nov
1997
4 Nov
'97
2:40 a.m.
Bill Currie wrote:
Actually, I meant there's no problem changing the name. That's the advantage of a function call: the RTS implementation gets hidden properly.
It might be an advantage, but since InOutRes is documented in BP, it should be the same in GPC. Therefore, I see no problem making inline code to check InOutRes.
--
Frank Heckenbach, Erlangen, Germany
fjf@gmx.de
http://home.pages.de/~fjf/links.htm