Nathanael Nerode wrote:
but the mismatched quotes look frankly hideous when *output* on any modern computer.
Thank you, my computer is quite modern, and they look fine. It's a matter of the font used, obviously, the computer used to display them has hardly anything to do with it.
I think the more interesting reference is: http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/ucs/quotes.html
Which, BTW, says that `...` in shell scripts "does not have to be changed and remains unaffected."
Even in Pascal we have things like `..' (standard Pascal), `=>' and `base#number' and `**' (EP), or `#number' (BP), e.g., even while other languages are much heavier in this regard.
You mean "..", "=>", "base#number", "**", or "#number", right? ;-)
Well, on this basis (Nathanael, making silly overgeneralizations and putting words, er characters ;-), in my mouth, and Thorsten, making wrong accusations combined with personal offence) it's pointless to discuss any further, and the issue isn't relevant to the origial topic anyway, so I consider this thread closed. Frank -- Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs: http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html GPC download signing key: ACB3 79B2 7EB2 B7A7 EFDE D101 CD02 4C9D 0FE0 E5E8