On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Chung Jae-youn wrote:

Philippe> What about gpc for gcc 2.7.1 ?
Philippe> Thanks for your help.  --

It would be a great pleasure if there is gpc for gcc 2.7.1 of course..

Juki said he was gonna work on a GPC for GCC v.2.7.0. Dunno if he started yet or not.

Arcadio

Hi Juki,

will the Borland stuff be implemented such that one can turn it *off* with a compiler switch? (Much like the -ansi option for gcc?) I'd love to have a way to write either very clean, portable Extended Pascal code or very borlandy code ...

Thanks! Stefan

On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Arcadio Alivio Sincero wrote:

...

On Wed, 22 Nov 1995, Chung Jae-youn wrote:

...

Philippe> What about gpc for gcc 2.7.1 ?
Philippe> Thanks for your help.  --

It would be a great pleasure if there is gpc for gcc 2.7.1 of course..

Juki said he was gonna work on a GPC for GCC v.2.7.0. Dunno if he started yet or not.

Hi folks... I did start to merge the borland mods to my gpc tree, but found out that I have to talk with Peter about some problems I encountered (my test programs broke; might be a problem with my upgrade, though). So it is probable that I will do the 2.6.3-> 2.7.1 upgrade first and fix the problems later with Peters help.

I did not upgrade to 2.7.0 because 2.7.1 was coming out, and now that it has, I heard that there are still more problems with than what we knew the 2.6.3 had (at least in the rs-6000), but I guess the upgrade would be useful anyway (ELF, etc) so I try to implement it soon.

				Juki
				jtv@hut.fi

Hi!

An option to turn the Borland extensions off exists in some sense: Just use --pedantic, and you will get warnings for everything which is not ISO.

Peter

According to Jukka Virtanen:

On Wed, 22 Nov 1995 sad@utkux.utcc.utk.edu wrote:

...

Hi Juki,

will the Borland stuff be implemented such that one can turn it *off* with a compiler switch? (Much like the -ansi option for gcc?) I'd love to have a way to write either very clean, portable Extended Pascal code or very borlandy code ...

Thanks! Stefan

I think it should (and partly must) be done so. Implementing another "hybdir" language is not what I would like to see.

I find that the extended pascal is a good language in itself, but I agree that there are far too many borland programs around to ignore them. (Also, the object pascal language looks nice and would be fun to support. Any volunteers? :-)

					Juki
					jtv@hut.fi

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dipl. Phys. Peter Gerwinski Fachbereich Physik Universitaet-GH Essen Phone: +49-201-183-2763 D-45117 Essen Fax: +49-201-183-2120 Germany e-mail: pege@mail.theo-phys.uni-essen.de --------------------------------------------------------------------------------