Peter Gerwinski wrote:
BTW, (Peter:) BP accepts "RunError" without an argument, so GPC should allow that, too. However, BP gives a "Runtime Error 0" then, which I don't like very much, since the exit status 0 usually means success. So, GPC should probably use some other error code...
Which one?
I'd say one in the "unsorted errors" range 0..99, perhaps 99 -- or 42. ;-)
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
I (Peter Gerwinski) wrote:
BTW, (Peter:) BP accepts "RunError" without an argument, so GPC should allow that, too. However, BP gives a "Runtime Error 0" then, which I don't like very much, since the exit status 0 usually means success. So, GPC should probably use some other error code...
Which one?
I'd say one in the "unsorted errors" range 0..99, perhaps 99 -- or 42. ;-)
What about 81 (assertion failure)?
Peter
Is it possible to hook the RunError in GPC? I would definitely be interested in a feature like that so that custom handlers can be used.
See ya! Orlando Llanes
"Meine Damen und Herren, Elvis hat soeben das Gebaeude verlassen!"
"Look out fo' flyeeng feet" O__/ a010111t@bc.seflin.org /|____. O <__. /> / \ ____________|_________ http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/Monkey414