4 Jun
2000
4 Jun
'00
6:32 p.m.
Clyde Meli wrote:
The hut.fi came from the reply header, so perhaps it needs to be updated.
Huh? There is no reply header unless you set one. (Before anyone asks: This is intentionally so. See: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html)
You are right about the fact that it would have flagged/ rejected these emails also. IMHO it's worth it.
Okay. Any objections? Peter -- http://home.pages.de/~Peter.Gerwinski/ - G-N-U GmbH: http://www.g-n-u.de Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - gpc-19990118 GnuPG key fingerprint: 9E7C 0FC4 8A62 5536 1730 A932 9834 65DB 2143 9422 keys: ftp://ftp.gerwinski.de/pub/keys/ - AntiSpam: http://spam.abuse.net