Hi All,
I think Pat makes a valid point by asking what the "adult" collectors
market consists of, because not all adults collect dolls that would be
aimed at the adult collector. I think at it's most basic the dolls are not
designed to be "played" with, but then how do you explain the adults ( like
me) who love to "play" with our dolls by redressing, restyling, and
displaying in different situations? Plenty of adults are happy with
playline dolls to redress and play with as well. For me, I must admit it
is a mix. I buy some of the playline dolls to "play" with ( loved the
Jam'n'Glam dolls and had to get one to fiddle with that hair!),but in
general I look for a more sophisticated style of doll. Most of the time
Barbie at her MOST sophisticated doesn't measure up to the class of Candy.
I think her general exoticness ( in her case, much of it based on
ethnicity) makes her a classier looking doll. The repaints look more like
real people, and less like a doll as well. I always get a kick out of the
choices that I make as well. Sometimes I swear I am going to get a doll to
"play" with, and then I find myself just displaying her in her original
outfit. I thought the holiday toast asian doll would be that way, and here
it is July, and she is still dressed for the party. Flores Rosada, on the
other hand, even when I ordered her, was a complete package, and I have yet
to redress her. Will be interesting to see how I do with the Feline
Formality doll. LOL Sometimes I think the longerie type dolls are a real
boon, because they are easy to decide to redress. My brunette silkie
changes her clothes often.
Kathy M. with not enough time to play with dolls in the summer.
At 11:31 AM 7/14/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>For my money's worth, the makeup is reminiscent of the Asian Candi done by
>Mikelman in 1996. What I mean by that is that makeup was heavy and made a
>sensation because it was so obviously painted. Maybe the blue and pink
>tones of the eyeshadow were over the top making the makeup was a bit
>controversial for the times.
>
>So, when I see the screening on this particular Candi, I'm not overwhelmed
>with awe, but I find what I see appealing. I would like to see the African
>American with this screening. Is that photo available, too?
>
>What is the marketing direction that Candis are taking to set them apart
>from Barbie Collectibles' dolls? What is the collector that is being
>targeted? Rene and Robin, both, refer to something called the "adult"
>collector. What defines an adult collector and why would Candi appeal to
>this kind of collector that Silkstone Barbies wouldn't? Or why do both
>kinds of dolls appeal to "adult" collectors? Just who and what is an adult
>collector of FASHION dolls?
>
>Rene points out that the appeal these Candi dolls have is that they have an
>"adult couture look that is different from more mundane looking dolls." Is
>it possible that Candi dolls have never represented the mundane by virtue of
>the ethnicities they've tried to capture? What else about them makes them
>less mundane?
>
>I ask all these questions because my mind's eye is not so attuned to nuances
>as it once was, and I'm hard-pressed to fully experience Candis today. It
>could be that the way the dolls wowed me in 1996 has become mundane to me.
>So I don't mean to throw cold water on any other collector's enthusiasn for
>the dolls. How do any of you original Candi collectors maintain your
>excitement for the dolls? And I know there a many of you still on this List
>that can answer that question. Regards, Pat Brown
>----- Original Message -----
>
Frivolities Antiques
Ft. Collins, CO