-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
First off, let me apologize for being gone for so long. I've been
ABEND for quite a while, and while Real Life(tm) threatened to sue me
for negligence. The usual bullcrap.
Anyway, I declined to follow the established semantics, as practice in
the whole of reference.texi; i.e., sticking to the uses set forth in
Texinfo's info pages.
I was wondering if I should go ahead and submit this, then work on
changing the rest of the docs, or if I should just go shove my changes
up my arse. :)
I haven't done much during my absence (just expanded private,
protected, public, and a few others, IIRC), so I hope I haven't done
much damage.
I'm planning on putting more work into the docs while I also work on
my other projects; should I go ahead with the semantic changes, or
should I just roll with what's already been done?
- --
Political Dissident Neil Santos
Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos(a)jabber.org
Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkEkjEAACgkQcpujh3OVmbtd2QCfYhURzRxALFWkIMuwthykxTgR
bRoAoKuzLTxw8FqGbKHJa/5hgdXMYKmk
=GUyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
