HELLO
Please tell me how can i get support for gpc installation.To which mail ID
,i will send my question.
Please support me.Tell me the procedure for GPC installation on Unix.
Thanx
Hi everybody,
I am happy to announce that the GPC web site
<http://www.gnu-pascal.de> is back online, after several weeks of
problems on the server.
The current GPC beta release (20041017) is on the download page.
Previous alphas/betas between 2.1 and this one have been omitted
since I'd have to reconstruct them from my archives and verify them
to be trushworthy, and I don't think it's worth the effort. If there
are serious problems with 20041017, I'd rather fix them, so everyone
can ugprade.
Thanks to Eike Lange and Benedikt Wildenhain for helping set up the
server again and to G-N-U GmbH for hosting the current GPC beta
release in the meantime.
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank(a)g-n-u.de
http://fjf.gnu.de/
GnuPG and PGP keys: http://fjf.gnu.de/plan (7977168E)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
First off, let me apologize for being gone for so long. I've been
ABEND for quite a while, and while Real Life(tm) threatened to sue me
for negligence. The usual bullcrap.
Anyway, I declined to follow the established semantics, as practice in
the whole of reference.texi; i.e., sticking to the uses set forth in
Texinfo's info pages.
I was wondering if I should go ahead and submit this, then work on
changing the rest of the docs, or if I should just go shove my changes
up my arse. :)
I haven't done much during my absence (just expanded private,
protected, public, and a few others, IIRC), so I hope I haven't done
much damage.
I'm planning on putting more work into the docs while I also work on
my other projects; should I go ahead with the semantic changes, or
should I just roll with what's already been done?
- --
Political Dissident Neil Santos
Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos(a)jabber.org
Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkEkjEAACgkQcpujh3OVmbtd2QCfYhURzRxALFWkIMuwthykxTgR
bRoAoKuzLTxw8FqGbKHJa/5hgdXMYKmk
=GUyZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is anybody else working on the docs? Could you let us know which
parts you're working on?
As for me, I'm working on reference.texi (the OO-related parts).
If anybody else is working on them, we really ought to communicate,
since we don't have the luxury of a CVS server (Frank: *nudge nudge*
*wink wink* *poke poke*)
That's all for today. :)
- --
Political Dissident Neil Santos
Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos(a)jabber.org
Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.3.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkDfbhIACgkQcpujh3OVmbuvrgCgw3qyZu8YxA31cuEjsrIk5UJO
408AoJ5ZUqY2VCTs9EVW9u44Up9biwdH
=VuZR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Moved this to gpc-doc]
On 03:52 03/06/04, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
> While we're at it, could anybody please kindly update all the other
> parts of the documentation that need updating (mostly programming
> and reference)? :-)
Since I'm working on an OO project right now, I guess I have a moral
obligation to update the OO-related areas. I'm working on some of the
OO-related Reference items (in particular, `private', `protected' and
`public'), although I can't say it's easy, considering:
1) I have never worked with and so don't know Texinfo, and I'm
figuring things out as I go along; and,
2) Most of what I know about OO Pascal comes from Borland, and
I can't exactly copy stuff from their textbooks.
Diffs to the archive you've uploaded will come in as soon as I've
made significant changes.
--
Political Dissident Neil Santos
Free Software Advocate Jabber: nsantos(a)jabber.org
Please avoid sending me attachments encoded in secret formatting.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html