Grx June 1999

grx@gnu.de

8 participants
10 discussions

Re: Grx Problems with linux-X11
by Hartmut Schirmer 07 Jan '00

07 Jan '00

2nd try ... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: Re: Grx Problems with linux-X11 Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:21:45 +0100 From: Hartmut Schirmer <hartmut.schirmer(a)arcormail.de> On Thu, 30 Dec 1999, DAANEN Vincent wrote: >Hi > I'm using grx23 with djgpp and all goes fine but, with linux, I meet >a problem > The problem is that GrSetColor don't seem to work : > - we define 1024x768x256 mode => pseudo color in 8 bits > - next we set the colors : for (i=0;i<256;i++) GrSetColr(i,i,i,i); : >we should have a gray-level color table from black (i=0) to white (i=255) > > but when I display an image of the gray-levels, I obtain colored >colors (green red,blue yellow...) > > Can someone tell me what to do to obtain my gray-level color table >using THIS WAY > Thanks Well, normally GRX wonŽt allocate all available colors under X11. Using the option ŽprivcmapŽ forces GRX to use a full 256 color map. You can either set the GRX20DRV environment variable to Žxwin::privcmapŽ or call GrSetDriver( "xwin::privcmap") Hartmut

2 3

Fwd: GRX copyright assignment to FSF
by Hartmut Schirmer 03 Jan '00

03 Jan '00

Third try to get this out ... ---------- Forwarded Message ---------- Subject: GRX copyright assignment to FSF Date: Thu, 30 Dec 1999 22:51:44 +0100 From: Hartmut Schirmer <hartmut.schirmer(a)arcormail.de> Hi Andris, hi Ulrich, both of you contributed major major parts to the GRX library. Before we can assign the GRX graphics lib to the FSF we need you principle agreement about this step. So far Csaba Biegl, Hartmut Schirmer, Michael Goffioul and Michal Stencl as major contibutors agreed in principle. Andris Pavenis and Ulrich Leodolter need to agree before assignment can be done. Andris and Ulrich, please send a note about your opinion to the GRX mailing list (grx(a)gnu.de) me (hartmut.schirmer(a)arcormail.de) Richard Stallman (rms(a)gnu.org) If Andris&Ulrich agree in principle about assigning GRX to the FSF Richard will send us the right papers to sign. To anyone who contributed to GRX and isnŽt listed as major contributor will need to sign a disclaimer. IŽll contact you after all major contributors agreed. Thanks to all of you and a happy new year Hartmut

2 1

Fonts in GRX
by Cavit Cahit VURAL 18 Jun '99

18 Jun '99

Hi everybody, I am from TURKEY, ISTANBUL. I need to change some characters in GRX fonts. They are bitmap fonts. Does anyone know any utility to change them easily.

1 0

FONTS in GRX
by Cavit Cahit VURAL 17 Jun '99

17 Jun '99

Hi all, I have to change some characters in fonts those GRX uses. Can anybody offer me any utility to do it easily. Best Regards

1 0

Re: GRX documentation
by Peter Gerwinski 11 Jun '99

11 Jun '99

Marcus Rohrmoser wrote: > > As we all know that's a pretty weak point still, ain't it? So I'd like > to know if there's somebody working on that and who - I'd like to join > him (her). I do not know of any existing project in this field. > If there's nobody on that I'd like to know what you think > about including the doc into the header and use a doc-tool - e.g. doc++ > - to generate printable and html docu. Is this something like the Linux SGML documentation system? > If I get no response, I'll assume there's no interest in documentation > at all and skip this project. IMHO there is a lot of need for documentation. To make GRX usable for Joe Average User who cannot derive how a function works from its source code, this is a necessity. Peter -- Peter Gerwinski, Essen, Germany, http://home.pages.de/~Peter.Gerwinski/ Maintainer GNU Pascal - http://home.pages.de/~GNU-Pascal/ - gpc-19990118 PGP key on request - 6C 94 45 BE 28 A4 96 - 0E CC E9 12 47 25 82 75 *** Vote against SPAM! ********* http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/ ***

2 2

Re: GRX documentation
by Sven＠rufus.central.de 09 Jun '99

09 Jun '99

> As we all know that's a pretty weak point still, ain't it? It's true! > So I'd like > to know if there's somebody working on that and who - I'd like to join > him (her). AFAIK - there is nobody working on it... > If there's nobody on that I'd like to know what you think > about including the doc into the header and use a doc-tool - e.g. doc++ > - to generate printable and html docu. Sounds good for me - I don't know nothing about these doc-tools, but IMHO it seems to be a good idea. > If I get no response, I'll assume there's no interest in documentation > at all and skip this project. Welcome Marcus! GRX is one of the most portable gfx-libs and IMHO the echo in this list don't show the real interest on your work (not representative). What kind of platforms you are using? How many time you could spend to the doc-project? ___, ((__ o ,____)) V E N I BTW: We could talk/write direct about specials in german language - my english is a shame

1 0

Re: GRX documentation
by OXALIS-LASER 09 Jun '99

09 Jun '99

>If there's nobody on that I'd like to know what you think >about including the doc into the header and use a doc-tool - e.g. doc++ >- to generate printable and html docu. >If I get no response, I'll assume there's no interest in documentation >at all and skip this project. I think it would be a great idea. I have been trying to get a GRX documentation for a long time but I never found a good one on the web.

1 0

Re: Archive this mailing list?
by OXALIS-LASER 09 Jun '99

09 Jun '99

1 0

GRX with memory driver for Linux
by Olivier Kreet 08 Jun '99

08 Jun '99

Hello, I read in the GRX doc that for Linux, available drivers are xwin, svgalib and memory. So if I used the memory driver, I wouldn't need to have sth like svgalib or xwin on my system, isn't it? In that case, how do I compile GRX for such a configuration? I see a makefile for x11, one for Linux/svgalib, but none for frame buffer. Please tell me if I'm missing something, Thanks, -- Olivier Kreet

1 0

Re: Archive this mailing list? (was: lightweight windowing system)
by Anja Drewitz 07 Jun '99

07 Jun '99

Alessandro Moure wrote: > > > As well, is this mailing list archived? > > > > Currently it is not, but we could set up an archive. > > > > What do people think? > > > It would be great, cause I use to save a lot of my time (and > other's people time too... ;) looking at the archives of other mailing > lists I subscribe. I like the idea of having a list archive, too. From now on, majordomo will archive the list, and subscribers can get files via mail. (Mail the command "index grx" to majordomo to find out which files you can get. Currently, nothing of interest.) If there is any interest in it, I could place my own collection of (earlier) mails that came via the list there. If you want an archive on the web, I need some info on how to do it. I heard there is a tool that makes web pages from a majordomo list archive. Anyone know where I can find it? Best wishes, Anja

2 1

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

Grx June 1999