Matthew Petricone a écrit:
Not quite sure what you mean exactly. Try taking a look at http://grx.gnu.de/readme.txt Specifically section B there is an option for setting HAVE_UNIX_TOOLS=y that allows you to use bash. I think this is your problem.
Well, there are two possibilities to compile GRX, since 2.4.7 The old one, devised for people who have a very minimal DJGPP setup, djdev, gcc, binutils and make, usually working in bare DOS with small machines. The new one is for people having a full system, frequently working in a DOS box under some Windows OS. The first have to set HAVE_UNIX_TOOLS=n and use the bare DOS command interpreter command.com, whether in pure DOS or in a DOS box under Windows The other can set HAVE_UNIX_TOOLS=y, and work under bash launched from DOS, and this is much more comfortable: possibility to use the configure script to automate some editing (interesting mainly for Pascal users): this is what I do usually. But the OP referred to 2.4.6 for which this second, better, possibility was not present, and instructions were for bare DOS users, working under Command.com, without bash which interprets differently some commands. I just said that you can as well compile 2.4.6 the old way under cmd.exe, the windows command interpreter, in a DOS box in a windows OS. But switching to 2.4.8 and compiling under bash is the best solution.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 6:00 PM, Maurice Lombardi Maurice.Lombardi@ujf-grenoble.fr wrote:
franck Ismael a écrit:
How can I used "COMMAND.COM" as my command interpreter (SHELL=COMMAND.CON)
on Windows XP to run "makefile.dj2" which is part of what I have to do to install the graphics library GRX 2.4.6 on Borland C/C++ and DJGPP v2.03 compiler.