On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 10:54:34AM -0700, George Shapovalov wrote:
> Under Linux, just grab the latest version released (under alpha
> directory on an ftp server, last betta is already WAY out of sync),
> usually it is pretty stable.
Oh.. I've got latest beta, and was quite surprised to find there
patches for `egcs', while I have only 2.95.3 and 3.0 installed.
> Also do not install gcc itself -- I had issues.
Thanks.
> As far as IDE goes you can use Rhide under dos (djpp) and linux.
thanks. I don't use IDE. And I don't write in pascal too -- I just
don't like feeling when I can't control what code would be produced,
and, unfortunately, I don't feel like it with pascal.
> BP compatibility: except newest features introduced in Delphy it
> is working nice.
What about types ??
I need that BP sourced would be compiled and work withput any changes,
and I exact memory managenent would be required. It is quite confusing
when `integer' takes 4 bytes instead of 2, especially if you have
limited memory and targe array of integers.
also, are BP sets supported? is `data layout' comatible, i.e. would
blockread() of some set work as expected ?? [byteorder is fixed].
can anyone explain me how 'absolute' works in gpc ?
> Few features require special compilation options, few are
> unimplemented on purpose.
> FPC: there was a discussion on this list and as I remember the word
> was that it is not implementing so many extended pascal features
Ok, I think I'll note this, and start with gpc, and will think about
FPC on request.
--
Wishing without work is like fishing without bait.
-- Frank Tyger