13 Dec
2002
13 Dec
'02
1:50 p.m.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:47:31PM +0100, Emil Jerabek wrote: [...]
Exactly the same thing happens also with some other variants of the schema Foo definition:
Sorry, this should be "Bar", not "Foo", of course. I've got confused myself by those stupid names ...
Emil
Bar (U: Cardinal) = array [0 .. U] of Char; Bar (L: Integer; U: Cardinal) = array [L .. U] of Char;