29 Apr
2013
29 Apr
'13
7:19 a.m.
On 29 Apr 2013, at 09:07, Jonas Maebe wrote:
On 27 Apr 2013, at 20:47, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
[snip]
BTW4: The reporter wrote this clearly in the comment to the FPC bug report...
The poster was obviously heavily invested in getting his code accepted by FPC. Given that GPC is known for its standards compliance and had the same behaviour as FPC, and given the fact that as a non-standards-expert I did not know that for-statement always solely refers to "loop body"
Or rather "statement of the for-statement". I thought it was just awkward standardese wording .
Jonas