7 Sep
2001
7 Sep
'01
3:49 a.m.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Well, we could, of course, label any arbitrary version GPC 2.1 or something. There are a number of known bugs, but far less than there were in GPC 2.0, so perhaps we should just do that. Any opinions?
Good idea. Pick a recient version that seems to have the least amount of "I'm having trouble installing gpc on my xxx" mail in the mailing list.
Russ