Neil Santos wrote:
On 19:18 25/05/04, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Oh, oh... While we're on the subject of objects, may we PLEASE have private, public and protected?
Oh, wait... There's a new release. Is it in there?
It's been already in 20030830 (and possibly some releases before that, don't remember exactly).
No, I mean actually implemented, not just being `syntatically accepted but ignored',
I also mean this. I checked it now, it was implemented in 20030507.
quoting the manual.
OK, in one chapter of the manual it wasn't updated. I'll do this now. (If you have such reports in the future, please include a precise reference so I know what you're referring to.)
Frank