20 Feb
2002
20 Feb
'02
12:30 p.m.
Hi folks,
da Silva, Joe wrote:
- I wonder if the words "store" and "reference" are complementary?
Is complementarity a demand here? Clear distinction's sufficient, I think...
How about "primary" and "secondary" instead? Or something else? This is subjective, but I'm not sure if the word "store" would "read" very well in the following suggested syntax (looks too much like a verb;-) :
Agreed, but IMO "primary" and "secondary" are too general words to really describe the use of the pointers. What about "stored" and "referenced"?
type pointer = ^integer; pointer2 = stored ^integer; pointer3 = referenced ^integer;
Cheers
Markus