7 Sep
2001
7 Sep
'01
7:14 a.m.
Russell Whitaker wrote:
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Well, we could, of course, label any arbitrary version GPC 2.1 or something. There are a number of known bugs, but far less than there were in GPC 2.0, so perhaps we should just do that. Any opinions?
Good idea. Pick a recient version that seems to have the least amount of "I'm having trouble installing gpc on my xxx" mail in the mailing list.
Because of the lag (see my other mail) and the problems that are there with the last released version (20010623) and a number of changes made since then, we'll have to wait at least a little longer now (but perhaps not too long then).
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/~gnu-pascal/todo.html