20 Oct
2003
20 Oct
'03
7:44 p.m.
Kevan Hashemi wrote:
In short: GPC with -O3 and fp.pas routines is about 10% faster than CW. If you want to avoid using fp.pas, then you will still be faster than CW if you keep the GPC round() and trunc() out of your most heavily-used loops.
I would be quite curious to know if there is any difference in speed and precision if you also pass the --fast-math option (possibly dropping IEEE conformance).
Regards,
Adriaan van Os