17 Feb
2005
17 Feb
'05
8:31 p.m.
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Waldek, many of these failure seem to be side-effects of the fjf1018 patch.
That is incompatible change. If we want fjf1018.pas to be accepted by default then: filehand.pas, fjf684.pas, fjf751k.pas, fjf751l.pas, fjf800.pas, random.pas are invalid. Personally I woud prefer to accept fjf1018.pas only in BP mode.
--
Waldek Hebisch
hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl