29 Apr
2001
29 Apr
'01
4:46 a.m.
Maurice Lombardi wrote:
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Maurice (or someone else?), is your C good enough that you can make a usleep replacement that calls usleep or delay based on this distinction, and test it on plain Dos and under Windoze? (In the case of usleep(), if the value is > 0 and < than the minimum possible (12ms or something), you might want to round it up to the minimum.)
The following works as expected on W98 DOS box and plain DOS:
[...]
OK, I'm putting it in, slighty changed so the Windoze detection is run only once.
It will be uploaded soon (20010429). When you get it, please check if it still works. (Also Olivier and others who are interested, of course.)
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/~gnu-pascal/todo.html