Contestcen@aol.com wrote:
Part 1.1 Type: Plain Text (text/plain) Encoding: 7bit
This is how the header and the very beginning of your message appears (quoted to avoid line wrap):
Received: from ngc224.gerwinski.de ([213.133.98.203]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmxc17) with ESMTP id <2005072120242901700gmiuge>; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:24:29 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [213.133.98.203]
.... snippage ....
From: Contestcen@aol.com Message-ID: 190.444ded83.30115e43@aol.com Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:23:31 EDT Subject: [gpc] Packing strings () To: gpc@gnu.de MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1121977411" X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5041 X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) Precedence: bulk Sender: gpc-owner@gnu.de Reply-To: gpc@gnu.de X-Mozilla-Status: 8001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 2005072120243101700rq73ve02tgmp
-------------------------------1121977411 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In any case, we are getting off the subj
Notice the header lines specifying MIME-Version: 1.0 and Content-Type. This means you are transmitting a mime-encoded attachment. Following is a clipping from another message on the list, taken more or less at random, and notice the Content-Type: heading and Content-Transfer-Encoding: header. I have no idea what mailer you are using (9.0 for Windows etc.. ??) but he is using ELM, which is a proper mailer. My mailer has been told to reject all those dangerous encodings, so I have to go through funny gyrations to see what I have just shown you.
You can look up the standards, including RFCs 2822, 2045, 2046, and 2047 (I think).
Now fix your system before sending anything further here. Please. It may require getting a standards compliant mailer. I realize you are using the worlds worst ISP in AOL, but that was your choice.
Received: from ngc224.gerwinski.de ([213.133.98.203]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmxc11) with ESMTP id <20050612193747011005d6rre>; Sun, 12 Jun 2005 19:37:47 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [213.133.98.203]
.... snippage ....
Subject: Re: [gpc] RE : Question on procedure parameters In-Reply-To: 1118257681.12114.55967@goedel.fjf.gnu.de To: gpc@gnu.de Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 21:37:32 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL100 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: E1DhYGy-0006Fw-00@hera.math.uni.wroc.pl From: Waldek Hebisch hebisch@math.uni.wroc.pl X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/) Precedence: bulk Sender: gpc-owner@gnu.de Reply-To: gpc@gnu.de X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 X-UIDL: 2005061219374701100hs985e02tbn4
Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Pascal Viandier wrote:
Anyway, I tried the conformant array parameter type and it works perfectly well for my needs (even on