Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Waldek Hebisch wrote:
Backtrace for fjf659o.pas:
Anyway, I'm ready to retract this test program, unless it's really a symptom of a real problem (which it doesn't seem so far). Or to change the test program to test it somehow differently (not sure yet exactly how, but perhaps there's something with low-level TFDD interfaces, I'll try it ...)
The attached version should do it. (Again, if you think there's a real problem here, we should discuss it, but if it's only this particular test, I think we can leave it at that.) fjf219c.pas had a similar problem (also questionable in the previous test program).
Frank