Bill Currie wrote:
I might modify this procedure a bit to use the (current) standard way of handling runtime errors (_p_generic and such), but this shouldn't be a problem. However, if you could move the check into the program, this would gain some efficiency.
Shouldn't be too difficult. I'll just have to figure out which expression tree's I need (a call is easier to build, that's all).
Yes, I guess so...
BTW: When I've done all the RTS work, I'll send you a list of all the RTS functions that need checking. Or did you already figure them all out?
On 29 Oct 97 at 13:41, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Yes, I guess so...
BTW: When I've done all the RTS work, I'll send you a list of all the RTS functions that need checking. Or did you already figure them all out?
Good idea. I took a stab and guessed which ones DIDN'T need checking (not many) and assumed all the rest did. Bill -- Leave others their otherness.
-
Bill Currie -
Frank Heckenbach