My version of gcc is 2.7.2. Is it a bad version to compilate gpc-971001? Or am I just downloading on an out of date server (agnes?)
AND_, DIV_ and all the family is well defined in parse.y. How should it be different?
What's wrong?
Am I?
Subject: Is gcc bad?
No. GCC is a Good Thing(tm). :-)
My version of gcc is 2.7.2. Is it a bad version to compilate gpc-971001?
Yes. gpc-971001 works with gcc-2.7.2.1 through gcc-2.7.2.3. This might be the cause of a lot of the problems you are experiencing during this installation.
Or am I just downloading on an out of date server (agnes?)
Agnes is per definitionem the most-up-to-date public server for GPC. The most current stuff is in /gnu-pascal/alpha/ instead of /gnu-pascal/beta/. In order to try that, you need gcc-2.8.0 or gcc-2.8.1.
AND_, DIV_ and all the family is well defined in parse.y. How should it be different?
`parse.y' is the source for `parse.c' and `parse.h'. The definitions are in `parse.h', and they seem to be behind those in `parse.y'.
You can either correct `parse.h' and `parse.c' manually, or let them be re-made from `parse.y' as described in my last mail.
What's wrong?
Am I?
No. :-) The file `parse.h' and perhaps also `parse.c' in the gpc-971001 distribution are wrong. Sorry for that.
Again: Good luck,
Peter