Opie Pecheux wrote:
Now, the curse23.zip file have disappeared, and i recommend pdcurs24.beta.zip . At first i install pdcurs24 on my pc, and it was working. But i didn't delete all my files before. If i try to install from the beginning, i have the message "curspriv.h: no such file or directory (ENOENT)." with rhide or in line.
Oh yeah... I used curspriv.h in some GPC versions, but not in the current one, so I didn't notice the problem when I uploaded pdcurs24. So, in order to use pdcurs24 you have two choices:
- Get the most recent GPC alpha (though I'm not sure if there are DJGPP binaries available), or
- get curspriv.h from the PDCurses sources (ftp://agnes.dida.physik.uni-essen.de/gnu-pascal/libs/pdcurs24.beta.22-May-99.zip)
What we have to do? I send all the file at the end. Note: i don't know how to use -v in gpc, all the messages go on the screen. How can i get them in a file?
DJGPP contains the redir utility for that purpose, e.g.:
redir -eo gpc -v ... > logfile
(But the screen dump below is also fine, apart from the line breaks...)
Frank
Frank Heckenbach a écrit:
- Get the most recent GPC alpha (though I'm not sure if there are DJGPP binaries available), or
I have compiled gpc binaries for the two last alphas for different versions of gcc:
ftp://genet.ujf-grenoble.fr/pub/GPC/gpc-19990813-gcc-281-djgpp.zip
and
ftp://genet.ujf-grenoble.fr/pub/GPC/gpc-19991030-gcc-2952-djgpp.zip
Beware that for gcc-2.9.5.2 increased checks make some old assembler programs to fail. There are a couple of new failed tests programs in gpc, which have been discussed in the list. But more important grx23 now fails to compile. I have kept the old 2.8.1 compiled library. I have seen a patch in the web for grx, but did not had the time to try it. Anyway I would prefer that the maintainers of grx check themselves that this is correct (the patch is given by a user which says that it works for him, but I don't know if he knows well enough what was intended to do: some assembler constructs have been forbidden because they are ambiguous, and checking that it compiles now is not enough, the ambiguity may have been resolved the wrong way)
Hope this helps
Maurice