Hi,
I need to know if anybody is experiencing the same thing here.
I have a gcc compiler 2.7.2.3 and the compilation for the gpc-2.0
aborted with a signal 6. Simply the cc1 just aborted. Below is what really happen.
cd rts && make RTSFLAGS="" make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/gpc-2.0/rts' for i in z_ARCTAN.o z_SQRT.o z_LN.o z_EXP.o z_SIN.o z_COS.o z_POW.o z_EXPON.o p_POLAR.o p_ARG.o; \ do gcc -c -o $i -g -O -D`basename $i .o` -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3 -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3 -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3/config -I. ./rts-zmath.c;\ done gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6 make[1]: *** [zmath-stamp] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/gpc-2.0/rts' make: *** [rts/libgpc.a] Error 2
I would appreciate any help with this.
Thanks.
On Thu, 8 Jan 1998, Phillip Bruce wrote:
Hi,
I need to know if anybody is experiencing the same thing here.
I have a gcc compiler 2.7.2.3 and the compilation for the gpc-2.0
aborted with a signal 6. Simply the cc1 just aborted. Below is what really happen.
cd rts && make RTSFLAGS="" make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/local/gpc-2.0/rts' for i in z_ARCTAN.o z_SQRT.o z_LN.o z_EXP.o z_SIN.o z_COS.o z_POW.o z_EXPON.o p_POLAR.o p_ARG.o; \ do gcc -c -o $i -g -O -D`basename $i .o` -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3 -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3 -I../../gcc-2.7.2.3/config -I. ./rts-zmath.c;\ done gcc: Internal compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 6
You have hit upon an internal GCC error, not a GPC error.
However, we are missing some crucial information:
What platform are you using? Did you use GCC to compile itself or was it compiled using a vendor supplied compiler?
gpc-2.0 should have aborted upon finding gcc-2.7.2.3, so you have made at least *that* change...
JanJaap
--- With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead. -- RFC1925.