Hi Peter
On Wednesday, June 30, 1999 5:34 PM you wrote
Hello, folks!
The EGCS is going to release egcs-1.2 as gcc-2.95.
How much sense does it make to continue support for (a) gcc-2.8.1 and (b) egcs-1.1.x?
Since it causes work to continue with (a) and (b), I'd prefer to switch completely to gcc-2.95.
Comments? Objections?
Receintly I purchased the latest distribution of SuSE: 6.1 It contains:
GCC 2.7.2.3-36 GPC 990118-0 egcs 990315-9
Their comment on egcs:
"This is the present state of the egcs-compiler-develement Unfortunately it is not advisable to compile a 2.0.x kernel with this compiler yet."
According to the file list egcs 990315 is egcs-2.91.66
Would expect the other distributions to be somewhat simular. Therefore, why not bundle a cut-down version of gcc-xxx with gpc? Then YOU control which version of gcc is being used and all the receiver would have to do ( hopefully ) is unpack and compile
Thanks, Russ russwhit@mind.net
Russ Whitaker writes:
Receintly I purchased the latest distribution of SuSE: 6.1 It contains:
GCC 2.7.2.3-36 GPC 990118-0 egcs 990315-9
Their comment on egcs:
"This is the present state of the egcs-compiler-develement Unfortunately it is not advisable to compile a 2.0.x kernel with this compiler yet."
According to the file list egcs 990315 is egcs-2.91.66
2.91.66 is egcs-1.1.2. That is the most recent released version.