"Russ Whitaker" wrote:

constovfl.pas failed: failed 0 fjf83.pas failed: Failed goto4.pas failed

These are "known bugs" in a GPC that works with gcc-2.95.x. I did not move them to the `knownbugs' subdirectory because I was hoping to have them fixed within days after the alpha release. :-I

fjf149.pas failed: 64

This is not really a bug but a change in the way `BitSizeOf' works. I am still unsure wheter we should keep the current behaviour, so I did not yet adapt the test program.

dialec3.pas failed

This one should not occur - and does not occur on all systems I have access to.

These Err messeges appeared just before dialec3.pas:

/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/units/pipec.o: In function `_p_pipe': /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/units/pipec.o(.text+0x0): multiple definition of `_p_pipe' pipec.o:/usr/local/src/gcc-2.95.2/gcc/p/test/./../units/pipec.c:40: first defined here /usr/bin/ld: Warning: size of symbol `_p_pipe' changed from 490 to 599 in /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/units/pipec.o collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Very strange. It seems as if the test compilation uses `pipec.c' twice from two different directories.

It would be useful to see the output of `gpc -v' here, but currently I cannot promise to handle it with high priority. :-( Sorry for that.)

/tmp/cc0y2DBt.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/cc0y2DBt.s:110: Error: operands given don't match any known 386 instruction

Doesn't this belong to `goto4'?

Peter