Russ Whitaker wrote:
Hi
Installed the newest release today. Ran test suite. Results:
total 1271 pass 192 skip 2 fail 1077
But that's somewhat misleading. almost all the error msgs were " ... is dangerous. Use lseek64 instead".
Is there a simple fix?
Which OS and libc version?
Could you please post the complete error message (only one if they're all the same)?
Frank
On Sun, 9 Jul 2000, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Russ Whitaker wrote:
Hi
Installed the newest release today. Ran test suite. Results:
total 1271 pass 192 skip 2 fail 1077
But that's somewhat misleading. almost all the error msgs were " ... is dangerous. Use lseek64 instead".
Is there a simple fix?
Which OS and libc version?
linux: slackware 7.1 dist., glibc-2.1.3
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/specs gpc version 20000707, based on 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
Could you please post the complete error message (only one if they're all the same)?
edited output to one msg:
TEST abso1.pas: /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-linux-gnu/2.95.2/libgpc.a(randfile.o): In function `do_seek': /usr/local/src/gcc-2.95.2/gcc/p/rts/randfile.c:327: the `llseek' function may be dangerous; use `lseek64' instead. OK
thanks, Russ