Orlando Llanes wrote:
>
> On Wed, 1 Apr 1998, Peter Gerwinski wrote:
> > According to Orlando Llanes:
> > > IMO, if the alpha and beta versions are as stable as 2.0, whichever
> > > works better should be set to a "gamma" version which would serve as a
> > > "stand-by" version so that when DJGPP 2.8.x is ready for release, the
> > > "gama" version will be placed in the distribution.
> >
> > And that "stand-by" version would be called 2.0.1 or 2.1.0?
>
> I'm posting this from an e-mail from me to Peter about GPC 2.1. I
> think that the "stand-by" version should be GPC 2.1.0 rather than 2.0.1,
> there have been a great many significant improvments from gpc 2.0 to where
> it is now even tho it's not quite there yet.
What about seting the version to 2.0.9 then change the version to 2.0.10,
2.0.11 etc. until 2.1.0 is ready.
> I also wanted to add something, when I said the "gamma" version should
> be released when DJGPP 2.8.1 is released, I meant that if the current Beta
> version is not ready, then the "stand-by" version be released instead with
> a note saying that the next version is in the works and is near completion
> (or something to that effect).
We can release it is 2.1.0 when it is ready. Then we can fix it
to work with DJGPP 2.8.1 and release 2.1.1.
Nick.
