15 Dec
2002
15 Dec
'02
12:49 a.m.
J. David Bryan wrote:
On 13 Dec 2002 at 12:33, CBFalconer wrote:
[Boolean (32)]
And there is no need for such an entity.
Need? No, granted, just as there is no need for, e.g., alternate number bases in specifying constants. It's simply a convenience for interfacing with external C routines that use that convention (e.g., a few thousand Windows API routines).
Are you sure? Do they really write:
struct MyBool { int BoolField : 32; };
And not perhaps:
typedef int MyBool;
???
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html
GPC download signing key: 51FF C1F0 1A77 C6C2 4482 4DDC 117A 9773 7F88 1707