11 Dec
2002
11 Dec
'02
5:50 p.m.
On 11 Dec 2002 at 3:27, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
AFAICS, there is no easy and clean way to achieve what's wanted here. The following would be just as wrong, of course:
type Int16 = Integer (16); Integer = Int16;
Is there a semantic difference between:
type Int16 = Integer (16);
and:
type Int16 = packed -32768..32767;
That is, can the packed subrange form replace the specified-size form in all cases?
-- Dave