On 22 Jul 97 at 13:07, Peter Gerwinski wrote:
As you probably were afraid of already, I cannot reproduce the bug. :-(
Yup, I suspected that. You use linux, don't you? Probably got a very different memory allocation scheme.
Just to be sure that we are talking about the same GPC: My line 134 of gpi-hash.c reads
for (l = hash_table[hi]; l && l->node; l =l->next)
Yes, that's the exact line in my version. What do you think of my theory about destroyed trees?
If the "l &&" is missing or commented out in your version, this would be the origin of the error. :-(But it isn't. That would be too easy.)
Much too easy :)
Such is life. But it's good that you have found this error *now* and not later when gpc-2.1 will be released. That's what beta test phases are for. Thanks a lot for your patience with GPC!
I'm glad I can be of some help. Bill -- Leave others their otherness.