11 May
2003
11 May
'03
12:59 a.m.
Adriaan van Os wrote:
The results below are for gpc-20030507 built with a patched gcc-3.2.1. The testsuite was run with run with EXTRA_PFLAGS="--longjmp-all-nonlocal-labels --maximum-field-alignment=16".
TEST dialec3.pas: [same for dialec5.pas, dialec6.pas, dostest.pas, dostest2.pas, windtes2.pas, windtest.pas and y2k.pas]
Insert `{$maximum-field-alignment 0}' in dos.pas and windos.pas.
TEST bitsizes.pas: failed
TEST fjf31.pas: failed: 2, 2, 1
TEST pack1.pas: failed
These tests test the size of packed records which is affected by maximum-field-alignment. So I think we should just insert `{$maximum-field-alignment 0}' in those tests as well, do you agree?
Frank
--
Frank Heckenbach, frank@g-n-u.de, http://fjf.gnu.de/, 7977168E
GPC To-Do list, latest features, fixed bugs:
http://www.gnu-pascal.de/todo.html
GPC download signing key: 51FF C1F0 1A77 C6C2 4482 4DDC 117A 9773 7F88 1707